Hello Jon,
On 10/20/2014 05:49 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100
> Mark Rutland wrote:
>
>> Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so:
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland
>
> Applied to my shiny new docs tree in case nobody else grabs it.
>
> jon
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100
Mark Rutland wrote:
> Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland
Applied to my shiny new docs tree in case nobody else grabs it.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100
Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
Applied to my shiny new docs tree in case nobody else grabs it.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hello Jon,
On 10/20/2014 05:49 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100
Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
Applied to my shiny new docs tree in case
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a
> Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs
> should come in the series before the implementation.
>
> This not only avoids
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a
Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs
should come in the series before the implementation.
This not only avoids
When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a
Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs
should come in the series before the implementation.
This not only avoids checkpatch.pl to complain about undocumented
bindings but also makes the review process
When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a
Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs
should come in the series before the implementation.
This not only avoids checkpatch.pl to complain about undocumented
bindings but also makes the review process
8 matches
Mail list logo