On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:45:58PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> 24xx BMCs have larger clock divider granularity which can cause problems
> when trying to set them as 25xx clock dividers; this adds clock setting
> code specific to 24xx.
>
> This also fixes a potential issue where clock dividers
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> That being said, I could implement this as a custom clock subclass, which
>> would probably be cleaner that what I have done.
>
> Shall I wait for that one or do you want this patch to be included?
> I don't mind, your call here...
>
Let's
> That being said, I could implement this as a custom clock subclass, which
> would probably be cleaner that what I have done.
Shall I wait for that one or do you want this patch to be included?
I don't mind, your call here...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Rick Altherr wrote:
> Is clk_fractional_divider from include/linux/clk-provider.h appropriate here?
>
Alas, no. clk_fractional_divider is not flexible enough to specify the
divider the
way that it is represented in the Aspeed 24xx/25xx parts which have the divider
Is clk_fractional_divider from include/linux/clk-provider.h appropriate here?
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Rick Altherr wrote:
> Is clk_fractional_divider from include/linux/clk-provider.h appropriate
> here?
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Brendan Higgins
> wrote:
>>
>> 24xx BMCs have
24xx BMCs have larger clock divider granularity which can cause problems
when trying to set them as 25xx clock dividers; this adds clock setting
code specific to 24xx.
This also fixes a potential issue where clock dividers were rounded down
instead of up.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
Chang
6 matches
Mail list logo
