Hi all,
I believe Philippe's comments about return values have been addressed
separately, and this patch was applied to drm-misc-next. But I have one
additional thought below.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:32:47PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> This takes care of 2 TODOs in this driver, by using the c
On 01/10/2018 02:02 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
This takes care of 2 TODOs in this driver, by using the common DSI
packet-marshalling code instead of our custom short/long write code.
This both saves us some duplicated code and gets us free support for
command types that weren't already part of our
On 11.01.2018 14:51, Philippe CORNU wrote:
> Hi Brian & All *DSI DRM experts*,
>
> 1) Re-reading this patch, I realize that the returned value of
> dw_mipi_dsi_host_transfer() is not correct: we should return the number
> of transfered/received bytes...
>
> so I think there are two solutions: fix
Hi Brian & All *DSI DRM experts*,
1) Re-reading this patch, I realize that the returned value of
dw_mipi_dsi_host_transfer() is not correct: we should return the number
of transfered/received bytes...
so I think there are two solutions: fix this in this serie or add a TODO
for later (both solu
This takes care of 2 TODOs in this driver, by using the common DSI
packet-marshalling code instead of our custom short/long write code.
This both saves us some duplicated code and gets us free support for
command types that weren't already part of our switch block (e.g.,
MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_LONG_WRITE
5 matches
Mail list logo
