On (04/09/16 22:05), Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Note that the 64-bit preprocessor test is not a cleanup, it's part of
> the fix, since those identifiers are bogus (for example, __ppc64__
> isn't defined anywhere else in the kernel, which means we'd fall into
> the 32-bit definitions on ppc64).
good
On (04/09/16 22:05), Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Note that the 64-bit preprocessor test is not a cleanup, it's part of
> the fix, since those identifiers are bogus (for example, __ppc64__
> isn't defined anywhere else in the kernel, which means we'd fall into
> the 32-bit definitions on ppc64).
good
Based on Sergey's test patch [1], this fixes zram with lz4 compression
on big endian cpus.
Note that the 64-bit preprocessor test is not a cleanup, it's part of
the fix, since those identifiers are bogus (for example, __ppc64__
isn't defined anywhere else in the kernel, which means we'd fall into
Based on Sergey's test patch [1], this fixes zram with lz4 compression
on big endian cpus.
Note that the 64-bit preprocessor test is not a cleanup, it's part of
the fix, since those identifiers are bogus (for example, __ppc64__
isn't defined anywhere else in the kernel, which means we'd fall into
4 matches
Mail list logo