On 2015/2/12 21:59, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 02/12/2015 03:28 AM, addy ke wrote:
>>> Hi Andrzej and Alim
>>>
>>> On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
On 2015/2/12 21:59, Alim Akhtar wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/12/2015 03:28 AM, addy ke wrote:
Hi Andrzej and Alim
On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 02/12/2015 03:28 AM, addy ke wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej and Alim
>>
>> On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> Hi Andrzej,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy
Hi Andrzej,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 02/12/2015 12:20 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> Hi Alim,
>>>
>>> On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>
On 02/12/2015 12:20 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Alim,
>>
>> On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
>>> On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
>
On 02/12/2015 03:28 AM, addy ke wrote:
> Hi Andrzej and Alim
>
> On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> Hi Alim,
>>>
>>> On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Addy,
On 02/12/2015 03:28 AM, addy ke wrote:
Hi Andrzej and Alim
On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon,
On 02/12/2015 12:20 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke addy...@rock-chips.com
Hi Andrzej,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/12/2015 12:20 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/12/2015 03:28 AM, addy ke wrote:
Hi Andrzej and Alim
On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57
Hi Andrzej and Alim
On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Alim,
>>
>> On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Alim,
>
> On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
>>
>> On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> Hi Addy,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
>
> On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Addy,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
>>> Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
>>> DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke addy...@rock-chips.com wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors,
Hi Andrzej and Alim
On 2015/2/12 07:20, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke
Hi Alim,
On 02/11/2015 03:57 AM, Addy wrote:
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke addy...@rock-chips.com wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by
On 2015/02/09 18:01, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi, Addy.
On 02/09/2015 04:25 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
> Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
> DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
> will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
> send command to
On 2015/02/09 18:01, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi, Addy.
On 02/09/2015 04:25 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc
On 2015/02/10 23:22, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke addy...@rock-chips.com wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This
Hi Addy,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Addy Ke addy...@rock-chips.com wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
Hi, Addy.
On 02/09/2015 04:25 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
> Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
> DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
> will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
> send command to update card
Hi, Addy.
On 02/09/2015 04:25 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
send command to update card
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
send command to update card clocks. If this happends, mci_send_cmd will
be failed and
Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
send command to update card clocks. If this happends, mci_send_cmd will
be failed and
26 matches
Mail list logo