Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask

2020-09-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:15:16 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> cpu_smt_mask tracks topology_sibling_cpumask. This would be good for
> most architectures. One of the users of cpu_smt_mask(), would be to
> identify idle-cores. On Power9, a pair of SMT4 cores can be presented by
> the firmware as a SMT8 core for backward compatibility reasons.
> 
> Powerpc allows LPARs to be live migrated from Power8 to Power9. Do note
> Power8 had only SMT8 cores. Existing software which has been
> developed/configured for Power8 would expect to see SMT8 core.
> Maintaining the illusion of SMT8 core is a requirement to make that
> work.
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask
  https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3babbe447d76ac2919ec4d0eb3b0adfb22f5b03c
[2/2] powerpc/topology: Override cpu_smt_mask
  https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/f3232321db58480804f80d59aeb651a5c859a200

cheers


[PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask

2020-08-07 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
cpu_smt_mask tracks topology_sibling_cpumask. This would be good for
most architectures. One of the users of cpu_smt_mask(), would be to
identify idle-cores. On Power9, a pair of SMT4 cores can be presented by
the firmware as a SMT8 core for backward compatibility reasons.

Powerpc allows LPARs to be live migrated from Power8 to Power9. Do note
Power8 had only SMT8 cores. Existing software which has been
developed/configured for Power8 would expect to see SMT8 core.
Maintaining the illusion of SMT8 core is a requirement to make that
work.

In order to maintain above userspace backward compatibility with
previous versions of processor, Power9 onwards there is option to the
firmware to advertise a pair of SMT4 cores as a fused cores aka SMT8
core. On Power9 this pair shares the L2 cache as well. However, from the
scheduler's point of view, a core should be determined by SMT4, since
its a completely independent unit of compute. Hence allow PowerPc
architecture to override the default cpu_smt_mask() to point to the SMT4
cores in a SMT8 mode.

This will ensure the scheduler is always given the right information.

Cc: linuxppc-dev 
Cc: LKML 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Michael Neuling 
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Valentin Schneider 
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Vincent Guittot 
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan 
Acked-by; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju 
---
Changelog v1->v2:
Update the commit msg based on the discussion in community esp
with Peter Zijlstra and Michael Ellerman.

 include/linux/topology.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 608fa4aadf0e..ad03df1cc266 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
 #define topology_die_cpumask(cpu)  cpumask_of(cpu)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) && !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
 static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
 {
return topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
-- 
2.18.2