Hi Dinh
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 16:38, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi Clément,
>
> On 11/2/18 10:58 AM, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Hi Dinh,
> >
> > Could you have a look at this serie ?
> >
>
> I've applied 1/3 and 3/3. I need to look over 2/3 to determine if that
> patch is still valid. I think a better
Hi Clément,
On 11/2/18 10:58 AM, Clément Péron wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
>
> Could you have a look at this serie ?
>
I've applied 1/3 and 3/3. I need to look over 2/3 to determine if that
patch is still valid. I think a better solution would be to set a clock
as critical so that it doesn't get gated.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:47:05AM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> Hi Dinh / Russell,
>
> Could you have a look at these patchs please ?
Nothing to do with me - it's up to the socfpga maintainer and arm-soc
maintainers.
> Thanks,
> Clement
>
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 13:20, Clément Péron wrote:
>
Hi Dinh / Russell,
Could you have a look at these patchs please ?
Thanks,
Clement
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 13:20, Clément Péron wrote:
>
> These functions are unused externally, removed them and declare
> the one used locally as static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-socf
These functions are unused externally, removed them and declare
the one used locally as static.
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron
---
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h| 2 --
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/cor
5 matches
Mail list logo