On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:20:03 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:54:51AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:02:29 +
> > Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> >
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:20:03 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:54:51AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:02:29 +
> > Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> > > > hi
> > > >
> > > > 在 2017/2/3 21:00,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:54:51AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:02:29 +
> Will Deacon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> > > hi
> > >
> > > 在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
> > > >On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:54:51AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:02:29 +
> Will Deacon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> > > hi
> > >
> > > 在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
> > > >On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:02:29 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > 在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
> > >On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
> > >>This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:02:29 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > 在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
> > >On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
> > >>This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table,
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> hi
>
> 在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
> >On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
> >>This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
> >>the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:
> hi
>
> 在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
> >On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
> >>This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
> >>the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each
hi
在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each register
defined by DWARF) and the "offset" member means the byte-offset
hi
在 2017/2/3 21:00, Will Deacon 写道:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each register
defined by DWARF) and the "offset" member means the byte-offset
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
> This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
> the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each register
> defined by DWARF) and the "offset" member means the byte-offset of the
> register in
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:06:05AM +, He Kuang wrote:
> This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
> the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each register
> defined by DWARF) and the "offset" member means the byte-offset of the
> register in
This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each register
defined by DWARF) and the "offset" member means the byte-offset of the
register in (user_)pt_regs. This change makes the code consistent with
x86.
Acked-by:
This patch changes the 'dwarfnum' to 'offset' in register table, so
the index of array becomes the dwarfnum (the index of each register
defined by DWARF) and the "offset" member means the byte-offset of the
register in (user_)pt_regs. This change makes the code consistent with
x86.
Acked-by:
14 matches
Mail list logo