Will Deacon; Scott Branden; Florian Fainelli; Pramod Kumar; Vikram
> Prakash; Sandeep Tripathy; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bcm-kernel-
> feedback-list
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: brcmnand: Fix pointer type-cast in
&
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:36:22AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> Correct me if I remember it wrong, but I thought this patch has already
> been merged by Brian?
You are correct.
Anup,
Please base MTD patches on the MTD development tree (i.e., l2-mtd.git):
http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html
Correct me if I remember it wrong, but I thought this patch has already
been merged by Brian?
Thanks,
Ray
On 10/16/2015 2:08 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> We should always type-cast pointer to "long" or "unsigned long"
> because size of pointer is same as machine word size. This will
> avoid pointer
We should always type-cast pointer to "long" or "unsigned long"
because size of pointer is same as machine word size. This will
avoid pointer type-cast issues on both 32bit and 64bit systems.
This patch fixes pointer type-cast issue in brcmnand_write()
as-per above info.
Signed-off-by: Anup
We should always type-cast pointer to "long" or "unsigned long"
because size of pointer is same as machine word size. This will
avoid pointer type-cast issues on both 32bit and 64bit systems.
This patch fixes pointer type-cast issue in brcmnand_write()
as-per above info.
Signed-off-by: Anup
Correct me if I remember it wrong, but I thought this patch has already
been merged by Brian?
Thanks,
Ray
On 10/16/2015 2:08 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> We should always type-cast pointer to "long" or "unsigned long"
> because size of pointer is same as machine word size. This will
> avoid pointer
Will Deacon; Scott Branden; Florian Fainelli; Pramod Kumar; Vikram
> Prakash; Sandeep Tripathy; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bcm-kernel-
> feedback-list
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: brcmnand: Fix pointer type-cast in
&
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:36:22AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> Correct me if I remember it wrong, but I thought this patch has already
> been merged by Brian?
You are correct.
Anup,
Please base MTD patches on the MTD development tree (i.e., l2-mtd.git):
http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html
8 matches
Mail list logo
