> Currently the tx channels share same pool of descriptors. Thus one channel can
> block another if pool is emptied by one. But, the shaper should decide which
> channel is allowed to send packets. To avoid such impact of one channel on
> another, let every channel to have its own peace of pool.
> Currently the tx channels share same pool of descriptors. Thus one channel can
> block another if pool is emptied by one. But, the shaper should decide which
> channel is allowed to send packets. To avoid such impact of one channel on
> another, let every channel to have its own peace of pool.
On 15.08.16 19:05, Yuval Mintz wrote:
Currently the tx channels share same pool of descriptors. Thus one channel can
block another if pool is emptied by one. But, the shaper should decide which
channel is allowed to send packets. To avoid such impact of one channel on
another, let every
On 15.08.16 19:05, Yuval Mintz wrote:
Currently the tx channels share same pool of descriptors. Thus one channel can
block another if pool is emptied by one. But, the shaper should decide which
channel is allowed to send packets. To avoid such impact of one channel on
another, let every
Currently the tx channels share same pool of descriptors. Thus one
channel can block another if pool is emptied by one. But, the shaper
should decide which channel is allowed to send packets. To avoid such
impact of one channel on another, let every channel to have its own
peace of pool.
Currently the tx channels share same pool of descriptors. Thus one
channel can block another if pool is emptied by one. But, the shaper
should decide which channel is allowed to send packets. To avoid such
impact of one channel on another, let every channel to have its own
peace of pool.
6 matches
Mail list logo