Hi Sean,
On 18/05/2018 17:48, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
>> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>>
>> This patch adds a variant of the get
Hi Sean,
On 18/05/2018 17:48, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
>> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>>
>> This patch adds a variant of the get
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>
> This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
> instead and will
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>
> This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
> instead and will
In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
instead and will not create a notifier if not yet created.
But the i915 driver exposes at
In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
instead and will not create a notifier if not yet created.
But the i915 driver exposes at
On 15/05/2018 17:22, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 05/15/2018 04:42 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
>> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>>
>> This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the
On 15/05/2018 17:22, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 05/15/2018 04:42 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
>> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>>
>> This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the
On 05/15/2018 04:42 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>
> This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
> instead and will not create a
On 05/15/2018 04:42 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
> name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
>
> This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
> instead and will not create a
In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
instead and will not create a notifier if not yet created.
But the i915 driver exposes at
In non device-tree world, we can need to get the notifier by the driver
name directly and eventually defer probe if not yet created.
This patch adds a variant of the get function by using the device name
instead and will not create a notifier if not yet created.
But the i915 driver exposes at
12 matches
Mail list logo
