On 2015/1/21 1:17, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> Gerry,
>
> So which direction did you take in your patch set-- a) common,
> generic msi_desc, or b) bus-specific msi_desc like Marc showed
> (mybus_msi_desc)?
Hi Stuart,
Currently I'm trying to go the former way as below.
Regards,
Gerry
Gerry,
So which direction did you take in your patch set-- a) common,
generic msi_desc, or b) bus-specific msi_desc like Marc showed
(mybus_msi_desc)?
Thanks,
Stuart
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/1/16 4:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06
Gerry,
So which direction did you take in your patch set-- a) common,
generic msi_desc, or b) bus-specific msi_desc like Marc showed
(mybus_msi_desc)?
Thanks,
Stuart
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jiang Liu jiang@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 2015/1/16 4:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Thu,
On 2015/1/21 1:17, Stuart Yoder wrote:
Gerry,
So which direction did you take in your patch set-- a) common,
generic msi_desc, or b) bus-specific msi_desc like Marc showed
(mybus_msi_desc)?
Hi Stuart,
Currently I'm trying to go the former way as below.
Regards,
Gerry
On 2015/1/16 4:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
>> starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
>> support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq domain to
>>
On 2015/1/16 4:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq
Hi Stuart,
On 15/01/15 20:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
>> starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
>> support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq
Hi Stuart,
On 15/01/15 20:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
support for this, by allowing a pointer to an
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
> starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
> support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq domain to
> be set/retrieved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq domain to
be set/retrieved.
As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq domain to
be set/retrieved.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
---
include/linux/device.h | 20
1 file
As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq domain to
be set/retrieved.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
---
include/linux/device.h | 20
12 matches
Mail list logo
