Hi Henrik,
grrr damn new gmail interface, I clicked on the wrong button.
sorry for the noise.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Benjamin,
>>
>>> >> This patch factorizes the hid
Hi Henrik,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
>> >> This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
>> >> hid_device->hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
>> >> usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
>> >>
>> >> However I
Hi Benjamin,
> >> This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
> >> hid_device->hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
> >> usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
> >>
> >> However I still can't remove the 2 usb related headers because the
> >> function
Hi Benjamin,
This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
hid_device-hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
However I still can't remove the 2 usb related headers because the
function mt_resume has a specific
Hi Henrik,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
hid_device-hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
However I still
Hi Henrik,
grrr damn new gmail interface, I clicked on the wrong button.
sorry for the noise.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
benjamin.tissoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Henrik,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
This
> > In my drawer, I have a patchset that aims to remove all usbhid
> > dependence, from all the drivers. Perhaps the attached patch is
> > something to consider here?
>
> yep, removing usbhid dependencies is a good thing.
> See my review below :)
>
> > From
In my drawer, I have a patchset that aims to remove all usbhid
dependence, from all the drivers. Perhaps the attached patch is
something to consider here?
yep, removing usbhid dependencies is a good thing.
See my review below :)
From 5d9a791e0a9e41bcea0fcb286e2849b403675f37 Mon Sep
Hi Henrik,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
>> This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
>> hid_device->hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
>> usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
>>
>> However I still can't
Hi Henrik,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
hid_device-hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
However I still
Hi Benjamin,
> This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
> hid_device->hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
> usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
>
> However I still can't remove the 2 usb related headers because the
> function mt_resume has a specific
Hi Benjamin,
This patch factorizes the hid set_feature command by using
hid_device-hid_output_raw_report instead of direclty relying on
usbhid. This makes the driver usb independant.
However I still can't remove the 2 usb related headers because the
function mt_resume has a specific patch
12 matches
Mail list logo