On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:22:52PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 08:03 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >On 09.01.2018 21:32, Brian Norris wrote:
> >>@@ -386,9 +386,9 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>}
> >>}
> >>- remainder = 0;
> >>- memcpy(&
On 01/10/2018 08:03 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 09.01.2018 21:32, Brian Norris wrote:
We're filling the "remainder" word with little-endian data, then writing
it out to IO registers with endian-correcting writel(). That probably
won't work on big-endian systems.
Let's mark the "remainder" var
On 09.01.2018 21:32, Brian Norris wrote:
> We're filling the "remainder" word with little-endian data, then writing
> it out to IO registers with endian-correcting writel(). That probably
> won't work on big-endian systems.
>
> Let's mark the "remainder" variable as LE32 (since we fill it with
> me
We're filling the "remainder" word with little-endian data, then writing
it out to IO registers with endian-correcting writel(). That probably
won't work on big-endian systems.
Let's mark the "remainder" variable as LE32 (since we fill it with
memcpy()) and do the swapping explicitly.
Some of thi
4 matches
Mail list logo