Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ring-buffer: Reuse rb_watermark_hit() for the poll logic

On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:38:42 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:19:21 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > > > The check for knowing if the poll should wait or not is basically the > > exact same logic as rb_watermark_hit(). The

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ring-buffer: Reuse rb_watermark_hit() for the poll logic

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:19:21 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > The check for knowing if the poll should wait or not is basically the > exact same logic as rb_watermark_hit(). The only difference is that > rb_watermark_hit() also handles the !full case. But for

[PATCH v2 2/2] ring-buffer: Reuse rb_watermark_hit() for the poll logic

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" The check for knowing if the poll should wait or not is basically the exact same logic as rb_watermark_hit(). The only difference is that rb_watermark_hit() also handles the !full case. But for the full case, the logic is the same. Just call that instead of