On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
>> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel
>
> Is there some logic behind that concern? What's magic about the release
> of 4.19?
Greg KH said 4.19
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
>> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel
>
> Is there some logic behind that concern? What's magic about the release
> of 4.19?
Greg KH said 4.19
Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:09:40 -0700
James Bottomley escreveu:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
>
Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:09:40 -0700
James Bottomley escreveu:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
>
> Not usually: people usually have to agree to a change like this. Of
> course "agree" is a variable concept and can be as simple as not object
> by a certain time or by using certain infrastructure.
Perhaps you should review the meaning of the word "dictator". :-)
-Tony
> Not usually: people usually have to agree to a change like this. Of
> course "agree" is a variable concept and can be as simple as not object
> by a certain time or by using certain infrastructure.
Perhaps you should review the meaning of the word "dictator". :-)
-Tony
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 21:04 +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is
> > concern that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel
>
> Is there some logic behind that concern?
Well, yes, Linux as a project goes through numbered
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 21:04 +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is
> > concern that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel
>
> Is there some logic behind that concern?
Well, yes, Linux as a project goes through numbered
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel
Is there some logic behind that concern? What's magic about the release
of 4.19?
Our benevolent dictator committed that patch. Didn't it take effect
as soon
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel
Is there some logic behind that concern? What's magic about the release
of 4.19?
Our benevolent dictator committed that patch. Didn't it take effect
as soon
Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how
Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how
12 matches
Mail list logo
