Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Ellerman
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: > Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu: >> With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry >> point. > > So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this > one? > > Is it ok

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Ellerman
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: > Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu: >> With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry >> point. > > So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this > one? > > Is it ok for me to process

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-24 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry > point. > Looks good. > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-24 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry > point. > Looks good. > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-24 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu: > With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry > point. So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this one? Is it ok for me to process it? Seems simple enough, has been thru a lot

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-24 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu: > With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry > point. So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this one? Is it ok for me to process it? Seems simple enough, has been thru a lot

[PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-22 Thread Naveen N. Rao
With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry point. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c

[PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

2017-02-22 Thread Naveen N. Rao
With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry point. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c index