Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for gdscs with gds hw controller

2016-02-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/01, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Some gdsc power domains can have a gds_hw_controller block inside > to help ensure all slave devices within the power domain are idle > before the gdsc is actually switched off. > This is mainly useful in power domains which host a MMU, in which > case its

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for gdscs with gds hw controller

2016-02-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/01, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Some gdsc power domains can have a gds_hw_controller block inside > to help ensure all slave devices within the power domain are idle > before the gdsc is actually switched off. > This is mainly useful in power domains which host a MMU, in which > case its

[PATCH v2 2/6] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for gdscs with gds hw controller

2015-12-01 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Some gdsc power domains can have a gds_hw_controller block inside to help ensure all slave devices within the power domain are idle before the gdsc is actually switched off. This is mainly useful in power domains which host a MMU, in which case its necessary to make sure there are no outstanding

[PATCH v2 2/6] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for gdscs with gds hw controller

2015-12-01 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Some gdsc power domains can have a gds_hw_controller block inside to help ensure all slave devices within the power domain are idle before the gdsc is actually switched off. This is mainly useful in power domains which host a MMU, in which case its necessary to make sure there are no outstanding