On 19 March 2014 16:22, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 19/03/14 13:33, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> [...]
>
Is there a way to check that MC and GMC have to have
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES set so that this can't happen unnoticed?
>>>
>>> So from the core codes perspective those names mean less
On 19/03/14 13:33, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>>> Is there a way to check that MC and GMC have to have
>>> SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES set so that this can't happen unnoticed?
>>
>> So from the core codes perspective those names mean less than nothing.
>> Its just a string to carry along for us
On 19/03/14 12:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> The keyboard deity gave us delete, please apply graciously when replying
> to large emails.
Sorry about that, will do next time.
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:12AM +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> +
On 19 March 2014 13:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> The keyboard deity gave us delete, please apply graciously when replying
> to large emails.
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:12AM +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > + if (sd->flags &
The keyboard deity gave us delete, please apply graciously when replying
to large emails.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:12AM +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > + if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) {
> > + sd->imbalance_pct = 110;
>
On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> We replace the old way to configure the scheduler topology with a new method
> which enables a platform to declare additionnal level (if needed).
>
> We still have a default topology table definition that can be used by platform
> that don't want more
On 03/18/2014 11:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> We replace the old way to configure the scheduler topology with a new method
> which enables a platform to declare additionnal level (if needed).
>
> We still have a default topology table definition that can be used by platform
> that don't want
On 03/18/2014 11:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
We replace the old way to configure the scheduler topology with a new method
which enables a platform to declare additionnal level (if needed).
We still have a default topology table definition that can be used by platform
that don't want more
On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
We replace the old way to configure the scheduler topology with a new method
which enables a platform to declare additionnal level (if needed).
We still have a default topology table definition that can be used by platform
that don't want more level
The keyboard deity gave us delete, please apply graciously when replying
to large emails.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:12AM +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
+ if (sd-flags SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) {
+ sd-imbalance_pct = 110;
+
On 19 March 2014 13:41, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
The keyboard deity gave us delete, please apply graciously when replying
to large emails.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:12AM +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
+ if (sd-flags
On 19/03/14 12:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
The keyboard deity gave us delete, please apply graciously when replying
to large emails.
Sorry about that, will do next time.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:12AM +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 18/03/14 17:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
+ if
On 19/03/14 13:33, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
Is there a way to check that MC and GMC have to have
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES set so that this can't happen unnoticed?
So from the core codes perspective those names mean less than nothing.
Its just a string to carry along for us meat-bags. The
On 19 March 2014 16:22, Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggem...@arm.com wrote:
On 19/03/14 13:33, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
Is there a way to check that MC and GMC have to have
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES set so that this can't happen unnoticed?
So from the core codes perspective those names mean
We replace the old way to configure the scheduler topology with a new method
which enables a platform to declare additionnal level (if needed).
We still have a default topology table definition that can be used by platform
that don't want more level than the SMT, MC, CPU and NUMA ones. This table
We replace the old way to configure the scheduler topology with a new method
which enables a platform to declare additionnal level (if needed).
We still have a default topology table definition that can be used by platform
that don't want more level than the SMT, MC, CPU and NUMA ones. This table
16 matches
Mail list logo
