On 10/28/2016 04:36 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> is there (going to be) as stable branch I can base these on, or should I
> just wait until the prerequisite patches appear in arm-soc/for-next?
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 16:49 -0500 schrieb Andrew F. Davis:
>> Some TI
On 10/28/2016 04:36 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> is there (going to be) as stable branch I can base these on, or should I
> just wait until the prerequisite patches appear in arm-soc/for-next?
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 16:49 -0500 schrieb Andrew F. Davis:
>> Some TI
On 10/28/2016 12:43 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 27 October 2016 at 15:49, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
>> Power Management Micro Controller (PMMC) on K2G SoCs) that manage the
>> low-level device control (like
On 10/28/2016 12:43 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 27 October 2016 at 15:49, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
>> Power Management Micro Controller (PMMC) on K2G SoCs) that manage the
>> low-level device control (like clocks, resets
On 27 October 2016 at 15:49, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
> Power Management Micro Controller (PMMC) on K2G SoCs) that manage the
> low-level device control (like clocks, resets etc) for the various
> hardware modules
On 27 October 2016 at 15:49, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
> Power Management Micro Controller (PMMC) on K2G SoCs) that manage the
> low-level device control (like clocks, resets etc) for the various
> hardware modules present on
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> is there (going to be) as stable branch I can base these on, or should I
> just wait until the prerequisite patches appear in arm-soc/for-next?
>
TISCI is still to be merged.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> is there (going to be) as stable branch I can base these on, or should I
> just wait until the prerequisite patches appear in arm-soc/for-next?
>
TISCI is still to be merged.
Hi Andrew,
is there (going to be) as stable branch I can base these on, or should I
just wait until the prerequisite patches appear in arm-soc/for-next?
Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 16:49 -0500 schrieb Andrew F. Davis:
> Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
>
Hi Andrew,
is there (going to be) as stable branch I can base these on, or should I
just wait until the prerequisite patches appear in arm-soc/for-next?
Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 16:49 -0500 schrieb Andrew F. Davis:
> Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
>
Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
Power Management Micro Controller (PMMC) on K2G SoCs) that manage the
low-level device control (like clocks, resets etc) for the various
hardware modules present on the SoC. These device control operations
are provided to the
Some TI Keystone family of SoCs contain a system controller (like the
Power Management Micro Controller (PMMC) on K2G SoCs) that manage the
low-level device control (like clocks, resets etc) for the various
hardware modules present on the SoC. These device control operations
are provided to the
12 matches
Mail list logo