Dominique Martinet wrote on Mon, Jul 23, 2018:
> I'll try to get figures for various approaches before the merge window
> for 4.19 starts, it's getting closer though...
Here's some numbers; with v4.18-rc7 + current test tree (my 9p-next) as
a base.
For the context, I'm running on VMs that bind
Dominique Martinet wrote on Mon, Jul 23, 2018:
> I'll try to get figures for various approaches before the merge window
> for 4.19 starts, it's getting closer though...
Here's some numbers; with v4.18-rc7 + current test tree (my 9p-next) as
a base.
For the context, I'm running on VMs that bind
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:25:31 +0200
Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Greg Kurz wrote on Mon, Jul 23, 2018:
> > The patch is quite big and I'm not sure I can find time to review it
> > carefully, but I'll try to help anyway.
>
> No worry, thanks for this already.
>
> > > Sorry for coming back to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:25:31 +0200
Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Greg Kurz wrote on Mon, Jul 23, 2018:
> > The patch is quite big and I'm not sure I can find time to review it
> > carefully, but I'll try to help anyway.
>
> No worry, thanks for this already.
>
> > > Sorry for coming back to
Greg Kurz wrote on Mon, Jul 23, 2018:
> The patch is quite big and I'm not sure I can find time to review it
> carefully, but I'll try to help anyway.
No worry, thanks for this already.
> > Sorry for coming back to this patch now, I just noticed something that's
> > actually probably a fairly
Greg Kurz wrote on Mon, Jul 23, 2018:
> The patch is quite big and I'm not sure I can find time to review it
> carefully, but I'll try to help anyway.
No worry, thanks for this already.
> > Sorry for coming back to this patch now, I just noticed something that's
> > actually probably a fairly
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:05:54 +0200
Dominique Martinet wrote:
> +Cc Greg, I could use your opinion on this if you have a moment.
>
Hi Dominique,
The patch is quite big and I'm not sure I can find time to review it
carefully, but I'll try to help anyway.
> Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:05:54 +0200
Dominique Martinet wrote:
> +Cc Greg, I could use your opinion on this if you have a moment.
>
Hi Dominique,
The patch is quite big and I'm not sure I can find time to review it
carefully, but I'll try to help anyway.
> Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11,
Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 18, 2018:
> I must admit to having not looked at the fcall aspect of this. kmalloc
> is implemented in terms of slab, so it's not going to be much slower than
> using a dedicatd slab (a few instructions to figure out which slab cache
> to use).
Yeah, kmalloc-8,
Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 18, 2018:
> I must admit to having not looked at the fcall aspect of this. kmalloc
> is implemented in terms of slab, so it's not going to be much slower than
> using a dedicatd slab (a few instructions to figure out which slab cache
> to use).
Yeah, kmalloc-8,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> +Cc Greg, I could use your opinion on this if you have a moment.
>
> Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> > Replace the custom batch allocation with a slab. Use an IDR to store
> > pointers to the active requests
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> +Cc Greg, I could use your opinion on this if you have a moment.
>
> Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> > Replace the custom batch allocation with a slab. Use an IDR to store
> > pointers to the active requests
+Cc Greg, I could use your opinion on this if you have a moment.
Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> Replace the custom batch allocation with a slab. Use an IDR to store
> pointers to the active requests instead of an array. We don't try to
> handle P9_NOTAG specially; the IDR will
+Cc Greg, I could use your opinion on this if you have a moment.
Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> Replace the custom batch allocation with a slab. Use an IDR to store
> pointers to the active requests instead of an array. We don't try to
> handle P9_NOTAG specially; the IDR will
Replace the custom batch allocation with a slab. Use an IDR to store
pointers to the active requests instead of an array. We don't try to
handle P9_NOTAG specially; the IDR will happily shrink all the way back
once the TVERSION call has completed.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
---
Replace the custom batch allocation with a slab. Use an IDR to store
pointers to the active requests instead of an array. We don't try to
handle P9_NOTAG specially; the IDR will happily shrink all the way back
once the TVERSION call has completed.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
