Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-07 Thread David Miller
From: Francois Romieu Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 01:42:29 +0200 > David Miller : > [...] >> If so, should I just apply this series as-is ? > > Yes. > > - the series is imho -stable unfriendly: whoever wants to figure what > should be fed into a -stable branch will have a hard time. :o/ > - the

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-07 Thread David Miller
From: Francois Romieu rom...@fr.zoreil.com Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 01:42:29 +0200 David Miller da...@davemloft.net : [...] If so, should I just apply this series as-is ? Yes. - the series is imho -stable unfriendly: whoever wants to figure what should be fed into a -stable branch will

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-04 Thread Francois Romieu
David Miller : [...] > I see there is still some discussion about dependencies between > patch #5 and #6, is that resolved? Yes. > If so, should I just apply this series as-is ? Yes. - the series is imho -stable unfriendly: whoever wants to figure what should be fed into a -stable branch

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-04 Thread David Miller
Francois what is the status of this patch set? I see there is still some discussion about dependencies between patch #5 and #6, is that resolved? If so, should I just apply this series as-is? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-04 Thread David Miller
Francois what is the status of this patch set? I see there is still some discussion about dependencies between patch #5 and #6, is that resolved? If so, should I just apply this series as-is? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-04 Thread Francois Romieu
David Miller da...@davemloft.net : [...] I see there is still some discussion about dependencies between patch #5 and #6, is that resolved? Yes. If so, should I just apply this series as-is ? Yes. - the series is imho -stable unfriendly: whoever wants to figure what should be fed into a

[PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-02 Thread Hayes Wang
Some codes are belong to binary codes and should be removed. Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang --- drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 26 -- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c index

[PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] r8169: Remove firmware code

2013-04-02 Thread Hayes Wang
Some codes are belong to binary codes and should be removed. Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang hayesw...@realtek.com --- drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 26 -- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c