On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:22:41PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
> > patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
> > but in the meantime,
Paul,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
> patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
> but in the meantime, these patches work well in cases where a given
> CPU has either zero or one
Paul,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
but in the meantime, these patches work well in cases where a given
CPU has either zero or one timers
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:22:41PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Paul,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
but in the meantime, these
Hello!
The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
but in the meantime, these patches work well in cases where a given
CPU has either zero or one timers pending, which is a common case for
NO_HZ_FULL
Hello!
The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
but in the meantime, these patches work well in cases where a given
CPU has either zero or one timers pending, which is a common case for
NO_HZ_FULL
6 matches
Mail list logo