On 03/02/2014 08:32 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> OTOH, hpa may prefer incremental patches, now that this lives in tip.
>
The branch currently in -tip is dead, so it is not an issue either way.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stefani Seibold wrote:
>
>> This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
>> and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
>
> What I'm missing from all the series is any trace of the significant
> review and debug work that
* Stefani Seibold wrote:
> This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
> and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
What I'm missing from all the series is any trace of the significant
review and debug work that Andy Lutomirski did for the series. Please
add Acked-by or
This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
The reason to do this was to get a fast reliable time stamp. Many developers
uses TSC to get a fast time stamp, without knowing the pitfalls. VDSO
time functions a fast and a reliable way,
This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
The reason to do this was to get a fast reliable time stamp. Many developers
uses TSC to get a fast time stamp, without knowing the pitfalls. VDSO
time functions a fast and a reliable way,
* Stefani Seibold stef...@seibold.net wrote:
This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
What I'm missing from all the series is any trace of the significant
review and debug work that Andy Lutomirski did for the series. Please
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Stefani Seibold stef...@seibold.net wrote:
This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
What I'm missing from all the series is any trace of the significant
On 03/02/2014 08:32 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
OTOH, hpa may prefer incremental patches, now that this lives in tip.
The branch currently in -tip is dead, so it is not an issue either way.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of
8 matches
Mail list logo