Hi Mark,
On 6 April 2017 at 02:42, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:51:00AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
>> + arch_timer_mem_freq = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(base);
>> + if (!arch_timer_rate && arch_timer_mem_freq) {
>> +
Hi Mark,
On 6 April 2017 at 02:42, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:51:00AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
>> + arch_timer_mem_freq = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(base);
>> + if (!arch_timer_rate && arch_timer_mem_freq) {
>> + arch_timer_rate =
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:51:00AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> + arch_timer_mem_freq = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(base);
> + if (!arch_timer_rate && arch_timer_mem_freq) {
> + arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_mem_freq;
> + } else if (!arch_timer_rate || arch_timer_rate !=
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:51:00AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> + arch_timer_mem_freq = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(base);
> + if (!arch_timer_rate && arch_timer_mem_freq) {
> + arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_mem_freq;
> + } else if (!arch_timer_rate || arch_timer_rate !=
From: Fu Wei
Currently the code to probe MMIO architected timers mixes DT parsing with
actual poking of hardware. This makes the code harder than necessary to
understand, and makes it difficult to add support for probing via ACPI.
This patch factors all the DT-specific logic
From: Fu Wei
Currently the code to probe MMIO architected timers mixes DT parsing with
actual poking of hardware. This makes the code harder than necessary to
understand, and makes it difficult to add support for probing via ACPI.
This patch factors all the DT-specific logic out of
6 matches
Mail list logo