Hello Maintainers:
Please help check this patch whether OK, when you have time.
Thanks.
On 06/18/2013 11:33 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hello related Maintainers:
>
> Please help check this patch when you have time.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 06/06/2013 05:37 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> For arm and m68k,
Hello Maintainers:
Please help check this patch whether OK, when you have time.
Thanks.
On 06/18/2013 11:33 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
Hello related Maintainers:
Please help check this patch when you have time.
Thanks.
On 06/06/2013 05:37 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
For arm and m68k, they
Hello related Maintainers:
Please help check this patch when you have time.
Thanks.
On 06/06/2013 05:37 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> For arm and m68k, they customize find_*_bit(), but the API is different
> with 'generic'.
>
> avr32, s390, and unicore32 also customize find_*_bit(), but the API is
Hello related Maintainers:
Please help check this patch when you have time.
Thanks.
On 06/06/2013 05:37 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
For arm and m68k, they customize find_*_bit(), but the API is different
with 'generic'.
avr32, s390, and unicore32 also customize find_*_bit(), but the API is
the
For arm and m68k, they customize find_*_bit(), but the API is different
with 'generic'.
avr32, s390, and unicore32 also customize find_*_bit(), but the API is
the same with 'generic', and the left architectures all use 'generic'.
So need change arm and m68k related API to match the 'generic',
For arm and m68k, they customize find_*_bit(), but the API is different
with 'generic'.
avr32, s390, and unicore32 also customize find_*_bit(), but the API is
the same with 'generic', and the left architectures all use 'generic'.
So need change arm and m68k related API to match the 'generic',
6 matches
Mail list logo