On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:52 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing
> > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible
> > devices/drivers. The
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:52 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing
> > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible
> > devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:52 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> The original intent of the virtio header relicensing
> from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible
> devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake.
>
> We have an ack from the only
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:52 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> The original intent of the virtio header relicensing
> from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible
> devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake.
>
> We have an ack from the only contributor as well as
The original intent of the virtio header relicensing
from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible
devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake.
We have an ack from the only contributor as well as the
maintainer from IBM, so it's not too late to fix that.
Make it
The original intent of the virtio header relicensing
from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible
devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake.
We have an ack from the only contributor as well as the
maintainer from IBM, so it's not too late to fix that.
Make it
6 matches
Mail list logo