Hi,
(12/21/2012 12:04 PM), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:02 +0900, Hiraku Toyooka wrote:
Currently, read functions for trace buffer use static "old_tracer"
for detecting changes of current tracer. This is because we can
assume that these functions are used from only one file
Hi,
(12/21/2012 12:04 PM), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:02 +0900, Hiraku Toyooka wrote:
Currently, read functions for trace buffer use static old_tracer
for detecting changes of current tracer. This is because we can
assume that these functions are used from only one file
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:02 +0900, Hiraku Toyooka wrote:
> Currently, read functions for trace buffer use static "old_tracer"
> for detecting changes of current tracer. This is because we can
> assume that these functions are used from only one file ("trace").
>
> But we are adding snapshot
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:02 +0900, Hiraku Toyooka wrote:
Currently, read functions for trace buffer use static old_tracer
for detecting changes of current tracer. This is because we can
assume that these functions are used from only one file (trace).
But we are adding snapshot feature for
Currently, read functions for trace buffer use static "old_tracer"
for detecting changes of current tracer. This is because we can
assume that these functions are used from only one file ("trace").
But we are adding snapshot feature for ftrace, then those functions
are called from two files. So
Currently, read functions for trace buffer use static old_tracer
for detecting changes of current tracer. This is because we can
assume that these functions are used from only one file (trace).
But we are adding snapshot feature for ftrace, then those functions
are called from two files. So we
6 matches
Mail list logo