Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] kvm: x86: kvm_emulate_*

2015-03-10 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:43:24PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote: > Review comments from v1 that used kvm_emulate_wbinvd() pointed out that > kvm_emulate_* was inconsistant in using skipping, while kvm_emulate() always > skips. The first patch cleans up the existing use while the second patch > adds

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] kvm: x86: kvm_emulate_*

2015-03-10 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:43:24PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote: Review comments from v1 that used kvm_emulate_wbinvd() pointed out that kvm_emulate_* was inconsistant in using skipping, while kvm_emulate() always skips. The first patch cleans up the existing use while the second patch adds use

[PATCH v3 0/2] kvm: x86: kvm_emulate_*

2015-03-02 Thread Joel Schopp
Review comments from v1 that used kvm_emulate_wbinvd() pointed out that kvm_emulate_* was inconsistant in using skipping, while kvm_emulate() always skips. The first patch cleans up the existing use while the second patch adds use of the updated version of kvm_emulate_wbinvd() in svm Changes

[PATCH v3 0/2] kvm: x86: kvm_emulate_*

2015-03-02 Thread Joel Schopp
Review comments from v1 that used kvm_emulate_wbinvd() pointed out that kvm_emulate_* was inconsistant in using skipping, while kvm_emulate() always skips. The first patch cleans up the existing use while the second patch adds use of the updated version of kvm_emulate_wbinvd() in svm Changes