Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf record'

2017-02-26 Thread Ravi Bangoria
Looks like I've older address of Masami(masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com) in my database. Adding To: mhira...@kernel.org -Ravi On Friday 24 February 2017 01:13 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > All events from 'perf list', except SDT events, can be directly recorded > with 'perf record'. But, the

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf record'

2017-02-26 Thread Ravi Bangoria
Looks like I've older address of Masami(masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com) in my database. Adding To: mhira...@kernel.org -Ravi On Friday 24 February 2017 01:13 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > All events from 'perf list', except SDT events, can be directly recorded > with 'perf record'. But, the

[PATCH v3 0/2] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf record'

2017-02-23 Thread Ravi Bangoria
All events from 'perf list', except SDT events, can be directly recorded with 'perf record'. But, the flow is little different for SDT events. Probe point for SDT event needs to be created using 'perf probe' before recording it using 'perf record'. As suggested by Ingo[1], it's better to make

[PATCH v3 0/2] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf record'

2017-02-23 Thread Ravi Bangoria
All events from 'perf list', except SDT events, can be directly recorded with 'perf record'. But, the flow is little different for SDT events. Probe point for SDT event needs to be created using 'perf probe' before recording it using 'perf record'. As suggested by Ingo[1], it's better to make