Em Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:40:06AM +0100, Alexis Berlemont escreveu:
> Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is another attempt to make the perf-trace subcommand print the
> > page fault durations.
> >
> > This solution is based on static tracepoints and it was necessary to
> > add 2 more
Em Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:40:06AM +0100, Alexis Berlemont escreveu:
> Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is another attempt to make the perf-trace subcommand print the
> > page fault durations.
> >
> > This solution is based on static tracepoints and it was necessary to
> > add 2 more
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is another attempt to make the perf-trace subcommand print the
> page fault durations.
>
> This solution is based on static tracepoints and it was necessary to
> add 2 more tracepoints. I understood that adding tracepoints is a
> questionable solution; I
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is another attempt to make the perf-trace subcommand print the
> page fault durations.
>
> This solution is based on static tracepoints and it was necessary to
> add 2 more tracepoints. I understood that adding tracepoints is a
> questionable solution; I
Hi,
Here is another attempt to make the perf-trace subcommand print the
page fault durations.
This solution is based on static tracepoints and it was necessary to
add 2 more tracepoints. I understood that adding tracepoints is a
questionable solution; I can try something else if someone has
Hi,
Here is another attempt to make the perf-trace subcommand print the
page fault durations.
This solution is based on static tracepoints and it was necessary to
add 2 more tracepoints. I understood that adding tracepoints is a
questionable solution; I can try something else if someone has
6 matches
Mail list logo
