On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 17:12, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 09:37, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >
> > > On Jun 11, 2019, at 6:18 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 00:57, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > >>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 09:37, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
> > On Jun 11, 2019, at 6:18 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 00:57, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:48, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Jun 10,
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 6:18 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 00:57, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:48, Nadav Amit wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 00:57, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
> > On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:48, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >>> On Jun 10, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Sean Christopherson
> >>> wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:48, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Jun 10, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Sean Christopherson
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 22:34, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>
> 2019-05-30 09:05+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> > The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
> > yield if any of the IPI target vCPUs was preempted. 17% performance
> > increasement of ebizzy benchmark can be observed in an
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:48, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
> > On Jun 10, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Sean Christopherson
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> >>> 2019-05-30 09:05+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> The idea
> On Jun 10, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Sean Christopherson
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> 2019-05-30 09:05+0800, Wanpeng Li:
The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Sean Christopherson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2019-05-30 09:05+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> > > The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
> > > yield if any of the IPI target vCPUs was preempted.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2019-05-30 09:05+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> > The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
> > yield if any of the IPI target vCPUs was preempted. 17% performance
> > increasement of ebizzy benchmark can be
2019-05-30 09:05+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
> yield if any of the IPI target vCPUs was preempted. 17% performance
> increasement of ebizzy benchmark can be observed in an over-subscribe
> environment. (w/ kvm-pv-tlb disabled,
ping, :)
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 09:05, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
> The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
> yield if any of the IPI target vCPUs was preempted. 17% performance
> increasement of ebizzy benchmark can be observed in an over-subscribe
> environment. (w/
The idea is from Xen, when sending a call-function IPI-many to vCPUs,
yield if any of the IPI target vCPUs was preempted. 17% performance
increasement of ebizzy benchmark can be observed in an over-subscribe
environment. (w/ kvm-pv-tlb disabled, testing TLB flush call-function
IPI-many since
13 matches
Mail list logo