> Looks like I forgot to CC Wolfram. CC'ing now on this cover letter, let
> me know if you also need the individual patches.
As long as the i2c-list is on cc, they will show up in patchwork and
then I'll have the patches. All fine here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Looks like I forgot to CC Wolfram. CC'ing now on this cover letter, let
> me know if you also need the individual patches.
As long as the i2c-list is on cc, they will show up in patchwork and
then I'll have the patches. All fine here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 16:59 +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On 29.07.2016 00:03, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >
> > This can be considered a v3 of "i2c: designware: do not disable
> > adapter after
> > transfer". Differences are:
> >
> > - Now there's a first patch that does not depend on
On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 16:59 +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On 29.07.2016 00:03, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >
> > This can be considered a v3 of "i2c: designware: do not disable
> > adapter after
> > transfer". Differences are:
> >
> > - Now there's a first patch that does not depend on
On 29.07.2016 00:03, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> This can be considered a v3 of "i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after
> transfer". Differences are:
>
> - Now there's a first patch that does not depend on IC_TAR being
> dynamically
> enabled/disabled: it just doesn't wait for the
On 29.07.2016 00:03, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> This can be considered a v3 of "i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after
> transfer". Differences are:
>
> - Now there's a first patch that does not depend on IC_TAR being
> dynamically
> enabled/disabled: it just doesn't wait for the
This can be considered a v3 of "i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after
transfer". Differences are:
- Now there's a first patch that does not depend on IC_TAR being dynamically
enabled/disabled: it just doesn't wait for the state change when not
needed.
- We added a patch
This can be considered a v3 of "i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after
transfer". Differences are:
- Now there's a first patch that does not depend on IC_TAR being dynamically
enabled/disabled: it just doesn't wait for the state change when not
needed.
- We added a patch
8 matches
Mail list logo