On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > Greg, what do you
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
> > > Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
> > Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm
> > developers?
>
> It's already in LTSI, as it's in
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm
developers?
It's already in LTSI, as it's in the 3.4
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Greg, what do you think about
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
> Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm
> developers?
It's already in LTSI, as it's in the 3.4 kernel, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:16:18PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Thanks all,
> > >
> > > At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Thanks all,
> >
> > At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
> >
> > Greg,
> > What should I do for promoting this
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
>
> Greg,
> What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset?
You need to get the -mm developers to agree that this is something that
is
Thanks all,
At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
Greg,
What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:56:46PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram
Thanks all,
At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
Greg,
What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:56:46PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram have
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Thanks all,
At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
Greg,
What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset?
You need to get the -mm developers to agree that this is something that
is worth
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Thanks all,
At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
Greg,
What should I do for promoting this dragging
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Thanks all,
At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:16:18PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Thanks all,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm
developers?
It's already in LTSI, as it's in the 3.4 kernel, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 10/29/2012 03:56 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product
> for a long time.
> It's time to go out of staging.
Agreed!
> Greg, Jens is already OK that zram is located under
> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minc...@kernel.org]
> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion
>
> The candidate is two under mm/ or under lib/
> Konrad and Nitin wanted to put zsmalloc into lib/ instead of mm/.
>
> Quote from Nitin
> "
> I think mm/ direct
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product
for a long time.
It's time to go out of staging.
Greg, Jens is already OK that zram is located under driver/blocks/.
The issue remained is where we put zsmalloc.
The candidate
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product
for a long time.
It's time to go out of staging.
Greg, Jens is already OK that zram is located under driver/blocks/.
The issue remained is where we put zsmalloc.
The candidate
From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minc...@kernel.org]
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion
The candidate is two under mm/ or under lib/
Konrad and Nitin wanted to put zsmalloc into lib/ instead of mm/.
Quote from Nitin
I think mm/ directory should only contain the code which
On 10/29/2012 03:56 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product
for a long time.
It's time to go out of staging.
Agreed!
Greg, Jens is already OK that zram is located under driver/blocks/.
24 matches
Mail list logo
