On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > > Can you help us
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > > Can you help us
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__
> >
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__
> > depth so it can be
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in moreĀ
> depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
> Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in moreĀ
> depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
> Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik
Andrew,
It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more
depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.
We appreciate feedback about this
Andrew,
It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more
depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.
We appreciate feedback about this
10 matches
Mail list logo