Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-20 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:17 -0500, David Long wrote: > Masami/Tixy, > > As I just noted in a previous email the kprobes.h thing has come back to > haunt me. Something more is needed in my last patchset. Tixy's > suggestion regarding the arch_specific_insn structure: > > > However, I also

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-20 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:17 -0500, David Long wrote: Masami/Tixy, As I just noted in a previous email the kprobes.h thing has come back to haunt me. Something more is needed in my last patchset. Tixy's suggestion regarding the arch_specific_insn structure: However, I also wonder if

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-05 Thread David Long
Masami/Tixy, As I just noted in a previous email the kprobes.h thing has come back to haunt me. Something more is needed in my last patchset. Tixy's suggestion regarding the arch_specific_insn structure: However, I also wonder if we should instead leave arch_specific_insn as a kprobes

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-05 Thread David Long
On 12/04/13 12:51, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: On 11/27/2013 04:53 AM, David Long wrote: From: "David A. Long" This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding hooks into the kprobes instruction parsing code

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-05 Thread David Long
On 12/04/13 12:51, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: On 11/27/2013 04:53 AM, David Long wrote: From: David A. Long dave.l...@linaro.org This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding hooks into the kprobes

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-05 Thread David Long
Masami/Tixy, As I just noted in a previous email the kprobes.h thing has come back to haunt me. Something more is needed in my last patchset. Tixy's suggestion regarding the arch_specific_insn structure: However, I also wonder if we should instead leave arch_specific_insn as a kprobes

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-04 Thread Taras Kondratiuk
On 11/27/2013 04:53 AM, David Long wrote: > From: "David A. Long" > > This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches > developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding hooks into > the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This approach >

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-12-04 Thread Taras Kondratiuk
On 11/27/2013 04:53 AM, David Long wrote: From: David A. Long dave.l...@linaro.org This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding hooks into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received.

[PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-11-26 Thread David Long
From: "David A. Long" This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding hooks into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This approach separates the ARM instruction parsing code in kprobes

[PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM

2013-11-26 Thread David Long
From: David A. Long dave.l...@linaro.org This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding hooks into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This approach separates the ARM instruction