On 4/15/2015 4:33 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:36:13PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
>>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> +++
Hi, Hal
On 04/15/2015 08:36 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
[snip]
>> __attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
>> @@ -1501,6 +1504,8 @@ struct ib_device {
>> int(*query_port)(struct ib_device *device,
>>
Hi, Hal
On 04/15/2015 08:36 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
[snip]
__attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
@@ -1501,6 +1504,8 @@ struct ib_device {
int(*query_port)(struct ib_device *device,
On 4/15/2015 4:33 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:36:13PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
--- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
+++
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:29:31PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > libibverbs also exposes transport at the device level. Isn't a change to
> > make transport per port rather than per device needed there as well to
> > be consistent with these proposed kernel changes ? If so, would the
> >
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:36:13PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> > index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
> > --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> > +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> > @@ -75,10 +75,13
> libibverbs also exposes transport at the device level. Isn't a change to
> make transport per port rather than per device needed there as well to
> be consistent with these proposed kernel changes ? If so, would the
> additional IBoE transport be exposed ? We also need to worry about
> backward
On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ enum rdma_node_type {
> };
>
> enum rdma_transport_type {
> + /*
On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
--- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
+++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
@@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ enum rdma_node_type {
};
enum rdma_transport_type {
+ /* legacy
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:36:13PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
--- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
+++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
@@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ enum
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:29:31PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
libibverbs also exposes transport at the device level. Isn't a change to
make transport per port rather than per device needed there as well to
be consistent with these proposed kernel changes ? If so, would the
additional IBoE
libibverbs also exposes transport at the device level. Isn't a change to
make transport per port rather than per device needed there as well to
be consistent with these proposed kernel changes ? If so, would the
additional IBoE transport be exposed ? We also need to worry about
backward
Add new callback query_transport() and implement for each HW.
Mapping List:
node-type link-layer old-transport new-transport
nes RNICETH IWARP IWARP
amso1100RNICETH IWARP IWARP
Add new callback query_transport() and implement for each HW.
Mapping List:
node-type link-layer old-transport new-transport
nes RNICETH IWARP IWARP
amso1100RNICETH IWARP IWARP
14 matches
Mail list logo
