Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-09-02 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:20:59PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or > VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. > Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace masked IRQ from > automasked IRQ. There

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-09-02 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:20:59PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or > VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. > Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace masked IRQ from > automasked IRQ. There

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Auger
On 08/12/2015 08:56 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 15:20 +0200, Eric Auger wrote: >> This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or >> VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. >> Currently there is no way to differentiate

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Auger
On 08/12/2015 08:56 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 15:20 +0200, Eric Auger wrote: This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-08-12 Thread Alex Williamson
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 15:20 +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or > VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. > Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace masked IRQ from > automasked IRQ. There might be

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-08-12 Thread Alex Williamson
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 15:20 +0200, Eric Auger wrote: This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace masked IRQ from automasked IRQ. There might be false

[PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-08-10 Thread Eric Auger
This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace masked IRQ from automasked IRQ. There might be false detection of activity. However it is currently

[PATCH v3 05/10] VFIO: platform: add vfio_platform_is_active

2015-08-10 Thread Eric Auger
This function returns whether the IRQ is active at irqchip level or VFIO masked. If either is true, it is considered the IRQ is active. Currently there is no way to differentiate userspace masked IRQ from automasked IRQ. There might be false detection of activity. However it is currently