Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter

2018-05-28 Thread Abhishek Sahu

On 2018-05-26 14:13, Miquel Raynal wrote:

Hi Abhishek,

On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:34 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
 wrote:


Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu 
---
* Changes from v2:
  NONE


Yes you did change things:

- s/<< 2/* 4/
- updated the cwperpage location
- the block handling the ecc-step-size property has been removed in a
  previous patch

Please be careful with that, it is time consuming to review the patches
all over again.



 Sorry Miquel for that.
 I Will pay more attention to this.
 I can understand the effort require in reviewing and how this can help
 in making review quicker.



* Changes from v1:

  1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 29 +
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c

index b538390..7377923 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2315,19 +2315,39 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct 
mtd_info *mtd, int section,

.free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
 };

+static int
+qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
+{
+   return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
+}
+NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
+NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
+
 static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
 {
struct nand_chip *chip = >chip;
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = >ecc;
struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
-   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
+   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
bool wide_bus;
int ecc_mode = 1;

/* controller only supports 512 bytes of data in each step */
ecc->size = NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
+   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
+
+   /*
+	 * Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with 
ECC

+* so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
+*/
+   ret = nand_ecc_choose_conf(chip, _nandc_ecc_caps,
+  mtd->oobsize - cwperpage * 4);


Nitpick: could you add parenthesis around (cwperpage * 4) just for
clarity.



 Thanks Miquel.
 I will update that.

 Regards,
 Abhishek


+   if (ret) {
+   dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ECC settings possible\n");
+   return ret;
+   }

if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
/* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
@@ -2396,7 +2416,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct 
qcom_nand_host *host)


mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, _nand_ooblayout_ops);

-   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
 cwperpage);

@@ -2412,12 +2431,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct 
qcom_nand_host *host)

 * for 8 bit ECC
 */
host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
-
-   if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
-   dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
-   return -EINVAL;
-   }
-
 	bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 
1;


host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE


Once corrected:

Acked-by: Miquel Raynal 

Thanks,
Miquèl


Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter

2018-05-28 Thread Abhishek Sahu

On 2018-05-26 14:13, Miquel Raynal wrote:

Hi Abhishek,

On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:34 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
 wrote:


Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu 
---
* Changes from v2:
  NONE


Yes you did change things:

- s/<< 2/* 4/
- updated the cwperpage location
- the block handling the ecc-step-size property has been removed in a
  previous patch

Please be careful with that, it is time consuming to review the patches
all over again.



 Sorry Miquel for that.
 I Will pay more attention to this.
 I can understand the effort require in reviewing and how this can help
 in making review quicker.



* Changes from v1:

  1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 29 +
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c

index b538390..7377923 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2315,19 +2315,39 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct 
mtd_info *mtd, int section,

.free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
 };

+static int
+qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
+{
+   return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
+}
+NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
+NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
+
 static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
 {
struct nand_chip *chip = >chip;
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = >ecc;
struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
-   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
+   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
bool wide_bus;
int ecc_mode = 1;

/* controller only supports 512 bytes of data in each step */
ecc->size = NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
+   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
+
+   /*
+	 * Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with 
ECC

+* so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
+*/
+   ret = nand_ecc_choose_conf(chip, _nandc_ecc_caps,
+  mtd->oobsize - cwperpage * 4);


Nitpick: could you add parenthesis around (cwperpage * 4) just for
clarity.



 Thanks Miquel.
 I will update that.

 Regards,
 Abhishek


+   if (ret) {
+   dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ECC settings possible\n");
+   return ret;
+   }

if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
/* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
@@ -2396,7 +2416,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct 
qcom_nand_host *host)


mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, _nand_ooblayout_ops);

-   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
 cwperpage);

@@ -2412,12 +2431,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct 
qcom_nand_host *host)

 * for 8 bit ECC
 */
host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
-
-   if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
-   dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
-   return -EINVAL;
-   }
-
 	bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 
1;


host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE


Once corrected:

Acked-by: Miquel Raynal 

Thanks,
Miquèl


Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter

2018-05-26 Thread Miquel Raynal
Hi Abhishek,

On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:34 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
 wrote:

> Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
> The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
> kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
> strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu 
> ---
> * Changes from v2:
>   NONE

Yes you did change things:

- s/<< 2/* 4/
- updated the cwperpage location
- the block handling the ecc-step-size property has been removed in a
  previous patch

Please be careful with that, it is time consuming to review the patches
all over again.

> 
> * Changes from v1:
> 
>   1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 29 +
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index b538390..7377923 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2315,19 +2315,39 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info 
> *mtd, int section,
>   .free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
>  };
>  
> +static int
> +qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
> +{
> + return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
> +}
> +NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
> +  NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
> +
>  static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
>  {
>   struct nand_chip *chip = >chip;
>   struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>   struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = >ecc;
>   struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> - int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
> + int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
>   bool wide_bus;
>   int ecc_mode = 1;
>  
>   /* controller only supports 512 bytes of data in each step */
>   ecc->size = NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
>   wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
> + cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
> +
> + /*
> +  * Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with ECC
> +  * so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
> +  */
> + ret = nand_ecc_choose_conf(chip, _nandc_ecc_caps,
> +mtd->oobsize - cwperpage * 4);

Nitpick: could you add parenthesis around (cwperpage * 4) just for
clarity.

> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ECC settings possible\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
>  
>   if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
>   /* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
> @@ -2396,7 +2416,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
> *host)
>  
>   mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, _nand_ooblayout_ops);
>  
> - cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
>   nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
>cwperpage);
>  
> @@ -2412,12 +2431,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
> *host)
>* for 8 bit ECC
>*/
>   host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
> -
> - if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
>   bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 1;
>  
>   host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE

Once corrected:

Acked-by: Miquel Raynal 

Thanks,
Miquèl


Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter

2018-05-26 Thread Miquel Raynal
Hi Abhishek,

On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:34 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
 wrote:

> Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
> The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
> kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
> strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu 
> ---
> * Changes from v2:
>   NONE

Yes you did change things:

- s/<< 2/* 4/
- updated the cwperpage location
- the block handling the ecc-step-size property has been removed in a
  previous patch

Please be careful with that, it is time consuming to review the patches
all over again.

> 
> * Changes from v1:
> 
>   1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 29 +
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index b538390..7377923 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2315,19 +2315,39 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info 
> *mtd, int section,
>   .free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
>  };
>  
> +static int
> +qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
> +{
> + return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
> +}
> +NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
> +  NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
> +
>  static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
>  {
>   struct nand_chip *chip = >chip;
>   struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>   struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = >ecc;
>   struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> - int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
> + int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
>   bool wide_bus;
>   int ecc_mode = 1;
>  
>   /* controller only supports 512 bytes of data in each step */
>   ecc->size = NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
>   wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
> + cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
> +
> + /*
> +  * Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with ECC
> +  * so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
> +  */
> + ret = nand_ecc_choose_conf(chip, _nandc_ecc_caps,
> +mtd->oobsize - cwperpage * 4);

Nitpick: could you add parenthesis around (cwperpage * 4) just for
clarity.

> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ECC settings possible\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
>  
>   if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
>   /* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
> @@ -2396,7 +2416,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
> *host)
>  
>   mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, _nand_ooblayout_ops);
>  
> - cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
>   nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
>cwperpage);
>  
> @@ -2412,12 +2431,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
> *host)
>* for 8 bit ECC
>*/
>   host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
> -
> - if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
>   bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 1;
>  
>   host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE

Once corrected:

Acked-by: Miquel Raynal 

Thanks,
Miquèl


[PATCH v3 06/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter

2018-05-25 Thread Abhishek Sahu
Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu 
---
* Changes from v2:
  NONE

* Changes from v1:

  1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 29 +
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index b538390..7377923 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2315,19 +2315,39 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info 
*mtd, int section,
.free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
 };
 
+static int
+qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
+{
+   return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
+}
+NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
+NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
+
 static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
 {
struct nand_chip *chip = >chip;
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = >ecc;
struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
-   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
+   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
bool wide_bus;
int ecc_mode = 1;
 
/* controller only supports 512 bytes of data in each step */
ecc->size = NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
+   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
+
+   /*
+* Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with ECC
+* so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
+*/
+   ret = nand_ecc_choose_conf(chip, _nandc_ecc_caps,
+  mtd->oobsize - cwperpage * 4);
+   if (ret) {
+   dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ECC settings possible\n");
+   return ret;
+   }
 
if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
/* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
@@ -2396,7 +2416,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
*host)
 
mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, _nand_ooblayout_ops);
 
-   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
 cwperpage);
 
@@ -2412,12 +2431,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
*host)
 * for 8 bit ECC
 */
host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
-
-   if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
-   dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
-   return -EINVAL;
-   }
-
bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 1;
 
host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



[PATCH v3 06/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter

2018-05-25 Thread Abhishek Sahu
Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu 
---
* Changes from v2:
  NONE

* Changes from v1:

  1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 29 +
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index b538390..7377923 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2315,19 +2315,39 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info 
*mtd, int section,
.free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
 };
 
+static int
+qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
+{
+   return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
+}
+NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
+NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
+
 static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
 {
struct nand_chip *chip = >chip;
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = >ecc;
struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
-   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
+   int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
bool wide_bus;
int ecc_mode = 1;
 
/* controller only supports 512 bytes of data in each step */
ecc->size = NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
+   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
+
+   /*
+* Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with ECC
+* so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
+*/
+   ret = nand_ecc_choose_conf(chip, _nandc_ecc_caps,
+  mtd->oobsize - cwperpage * 4);
+   if (ret) {
+   dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ECC settings possible\n");
+   return ret;
+   }
 
if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
/* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
@@ -2396,7 +2416,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
*host)
 
mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, _nand_ooblayout_ops);
 
-   cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
 cwperpage);
 
@@ -2412,12 +2431,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host 
*host)
 * for 8 bit ECC
 */
host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
-
-   if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
-   dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
-   return -EINVAL;
-   }
-
bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 1;
 
host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation