On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Bunch of places in the code weren't using it where they could be -
> this'll reduce the size of the patch that puts bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx
> into a struct bvec_iter.
The aoe changes look fine to me, thanks.
--
Ed Cashin
ecas...@coraid.
Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Bunch of places in the code weren't using it where they could be -
> this'll reduce the size of the patch that puts bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx
> into a struct bvec_iter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
> CC: Jens Axboe
> CC: "Ed L. Cashin"
> CC: Nick Piggin
> CC: Jiri
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:04:50PM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
> Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Bunch of places in the code weren't using it where they could be -
> > this'll reduce the size of the patch that puts bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx
> > into a struct bvec_iter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
Bunch of places in the code weren't using it where they could be -
this'll reduce the size of the patch that puts bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx
into a struct bvec_iter.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
CC: Jens Axboe
CC: "Ed L. Cashin"
CC: Nick Piggin
CC: Jiri Kosina
CC: Jim Paris
CC: Geoff Levand
4 matches
Mail list logo