On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:34 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:03:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > The expectation is that the kernel and IVRS will produce the same
> > result for topology based aliases while the kernel will also include
> > device specific DMA quirks.
>
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:03:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The expectation is that the kernel and IVRS will produce the same
> result for topology based aliases while the kernel will also include
> device specific DMA quirks.
Is that expectation really true? There are PCIe devices out
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:03:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
The expectation is that the kernel and IVRS will produce the same
result for topology based aliases while the kernel will also include
device specific DMA quirks.
Is that expectation really true? There are PCIe devices out there
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:34 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:03:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
The expectation is that the kernel and IVRS will produce the same
result for topology based aliases while the kernel will also include
device specific DMA quirks.
Is
The IVRS tables provides aliases, but not to the extent now provided
by PCI core with DMA alias support and pci_find_dma_isolation_root().
The expectation is that the kernel and IVRS will produce the same
result for topology based aliases while the kernel will also include
device specific DMA
The IVRS tables provides aliases, but not to the extent now provided
by PCI core with DMA alias support and pci_find_dma_isolation_root().
The expectation is that the kernel and IVRS will produce the same
result for topology based aliases while the kernel will also include
device specific DMA
6 matches
Mail list logo
