On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, mark gross wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:10:09PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, September 17, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
[...]
> > > > What QoS types do you think could be used here?
> > >
> > > I don't think the devfreq core needs to care of
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, mark gross wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:10:09PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
[...]
What QoS types do you think could be used here?
I don't think the devfreq core needs to care of it.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:10:09PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, September 17, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > Sender : Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Date : 2012-09-09 07:20 (GMT+09:00)
> > Title : Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: add global PM QoS support
> > >
On Monday, September 17, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> Sender : Rafael J. Wysocki
> Date : 2012-09-09 07:20 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: add global PM QoS support
> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > > Even if the performance o
Sender : Rafael J. Wysocki
Date : 2012-09-09 07:20 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: add global PM QoS support
> On Thursday, August 30, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > Even if the performance of a device is controlled properly with devfreq,
> > sometimes, we still
Sender : Rafael J. Wysockir...@sisk.pl
Date : 2012-09-09 07:20 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: add global PM QoS support
On Thursday, August 30, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Even if the performance of a device is controlled properly with devfreq,
sometimes, we still need
On Monday, September 17, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Sender : Rafael J. Wysockir...@sisk.pl
Date : 2012-09-09 07:20 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: add global PM QoS support
On Thursday, August 30, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Even if the performance of a device
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:10:09PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Sender : Rafael J. Wysockir...@sisk.pl
Date : 2012-09-09 07:20 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: add global PM QoS support
On Thursday, August 30, 2012
On Thursday, August 30, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> Even if the performance of a device is controlled properly with devfreq,
> sometimes, we still need to get PM-QoS inputs in order to meet the
> required performance.
>
> In our testbed of Exynos4412, which has on-chip various DMA devices, the
>
On Thursday, August 30, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Even if the performance of a device is controlled properly with devfreq,
sometimes, we still need to get PM-QoS inputs in order to meet the
required performance.
In our testbed of Exynos4412, which has on-chip various DMA devices, the
memory
Even if the performance of a device is controlled properly with devfreq,
sometimes, we still need to get PM-QoS inputs in order to meet the
required performance.
In our testbed of Exynos4412, which has on-chip various DMA devices, the
memory interface and system bus are controlled according to
Even if the performance of a device is controlled properly with devfreq,
sometimes, we still need to get PM-QoS inputs in order to meet the
required performance.
In our testbed of Exynos4412, which has on-chip various DMA devices, the
memory interface and system bus are controlled according to
12 matches
Mail list logo
