On 6 May 2015 at 16:43, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
>> On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >
>> >> I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
>> >> that's the case, please ignore it.
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >
> >> I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
> >> that's the case, please ignore it.
> >>
> >> I have a long term vision to fully enable
On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
>> I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
>> that's the case, please ignore it.
>>
>> I have a long term vision to fully enable support for a runtime PM
>> centric configuration for
On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
that's the case, please ignore it.
I have a long term vision to fully enable support for a runtime PM
centric
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
that's the case, please ignore it.
I have a long term vision to fully
On 6 May 2015 at 16:43, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
> that's the case, please ignore it.
>
> I have a long term vision to fully enable support for a runtime PM
> centric configuration for drivers/subsystems. The idea is, that such
>
On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Tomeu,
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for the patch.
>> >>
>> >> On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu
On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
I hesitated to send this reply, since it might add confusion. If
that's the case, please ignore it.
I have a long term vision to fully enable support for a runtime PM
centric configuration for drivers/subsystems. The idea is, that such
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 04:26:39 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >
> >> On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Tomeu,
> >> >>
> >>
On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Tomeu,
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for the patch.
>> >>
>> >> On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu
On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 04:26:39 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 20 April 2015 at 16:12, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tomeu,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch.
> >>
> >> On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> > Introduce a new per-device flag
On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomeu,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> > Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
>> > instruct the PM core
On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
instruct the
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 17 April 2015 at 19:30, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Introduce a new per-device flag
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomeu,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
> > instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
>
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
> instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
> when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:24:49PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
> instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
> when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime suspend when
> the system
Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime suspend when
the system goes into a sleep power state.
This is needed because otherwise it would
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
when
Hi Tomeu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime
Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime suspend when
the system goes into a sleep power state.
This is needed because otherwise it would
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:24:49PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime suspend when
the system goes
26 matches
Mail list logo