On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:03:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> This really should also have been Cc'ed to TJ, doing so now.
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:53:31PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
> > CPU it is running on, we do
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:03:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> This really should also have been Cc'ed to TJ, doing so now.
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:53:31PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
> > CPU it is running on, we do
This really should also have been Cc'ed to TJ, doing so now.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:53:31PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
> CPU it is running on, we do not need passing a CPU ID as an
> argument.
>
> Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov
This really should also have been Cc'ed to TJ, doing so now.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:53:31PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
> CPU it is running on, we do not need passing a CPU ID as an
> argument.
>
> Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov
Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
CPU it is running on, we do not need passing a CPU ID as an
argument.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev
Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
CPU it is running on, we do not need passing a CPU ID as an
argument.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/workqueue.c
6 matches
Mail list logo