Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] update mem= option's spec according to its implementation

2012-10-29 Thread Wen Congyang
At 10/29/2012 06:48 PM, richard -rw- weinberger Wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang wrote: >> Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and >> implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working >> for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expect

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] update mem= option's spec according to its implementation

2012-10-29 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang wrote: > Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and > implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working > for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So > we should update the specification. > > Signed-off-

[PATCH v3 1/2] update mem= option's spec according to its implementation

2012-10-29 Thread Wen Congyang
Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So we should update the specification. Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang Sort-of-tentatively-acked-by: Rob Landley ---