At 10/29/2012 06:48 PM, richard -rw- weinberger Wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and
>> implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working
>> for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expect
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and
> implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working
> for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So
> we should update the specification.
>
> Signed-off-
Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and
implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working
for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So
we should update the specification.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang
Sort-of-tentatively-acked-by: Rob Landley
---
3 matches
Mail list logo