On Saturday 12 November 2016 11:36 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>> Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
>> IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
>> than one flag after the
On Saturday 12 November 2016 11:36 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>> Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
>> IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
>> than one flag after the
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
> IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
> than one flag after the disjunction. This eventually results in giving
> false positives by the script.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
> IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
> than one flag after the disjunction. This eventually results in giving
> false positives by the script.
Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
than one flag after the disjunction. This eventually results in giving
false positives by the script. This patch eliminates these FPs by
improving the rule.
Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
than one flag after the disjunction. This eventually results in giving
false positives by the script. This patch eliminates these FPs by
improving the rule.
6 matches
Mail list logo