On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:06 AM Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:25:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of
> > > __early_init_dt_decla
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:25:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of
> > __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in
> > drivers/of/fdt.c.
> >
> > Sugge
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of
> __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in
> drivers/of/fdt.c.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli
> ---
> drivers/of/
ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of
__early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in
drivers/of/fdt.c.
Suggested-by: Rob Herring
---
drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index
4 matches
Mail list logo