Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-12-27 14:50, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as > long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-12-27 14:50, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as > long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as > long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as > long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as > long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as > long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- >

[PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 37

[PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. State explicitly that any "," pair is accepted as long as one of the listed strings is used as fallback. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 37 +--