On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:29:20PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 6/9/20 2:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:45:58PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> >> This adds description of the level bitmask feature.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jonathan Corbet
Hi Greg,
On 6/9/20 2:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:45:58PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> This adds description of the level bitmask feature.
>>
>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet (maintainer:DOCUMENTATION)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov
>> ---
>>
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 09:09 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:35:31PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 08:31 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:58:07AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:35:31PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 08:31 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:58:07AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > What is wrong with the existing
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 08:31 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:58:07AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > What is wrong with the existing control of dynamic
> > > debug messages that you want to add another
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:58:07AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > What is wrong with the existing control of dynamic
> > debug messages that you want to add another type of arbitrary grouping
> > to it?
>
> There is no existing
On 09/06/2020 18:56, Joe Perches wrote:
> These are _not_ netif_ control flags. Some are though.
> For instance:
>
> $ git grep "MODULE_PARM.*\bdebug\b" drivers/net | head -10
> [...]
>
> These are all level/class output controls.
TIL, thanks! I should have looked deeperrather than assuming
they
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 18:42 +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 09/06/2020 17:58, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > What is wrong with the existing control of dynamic
> > > debug messages that you want to add another type of arbitrary grouping
> >
On 09/06/2020 17:58, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> What is wrong with the existing control of dynamic
>> debug messages that you want to add another type of arbitrary grouping
>> to it?
> There is no existing grouping mechanism.
>
> Many
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> What is wrong with the existing control of dynamic
> debug messages that you want to add another type of arbitrary grouping
> to it?
There is no existing grouping mechanism.
Many drivers and some subsystems used an internal one
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:45:58PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> This adds description of the level bitmask feature.
>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet (maintainer:DOCUMENTATION)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst | 10 ++
> 1 file
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:45:58PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> +level
> +The given level will be a bitmask ANDed with the level of the each
> ``pr_debug()``
> +callsite. This will allow to group debug messages and show only those of
> the
> +same level. The -p flag takes
This adds description of the level bitmask feature.
Cc: Jonathan Corbet (maintainer:DOCUMENTATION)
Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov
---
Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git
13 matches
Mail list logo
