On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:31:18 -0700 Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:46:29AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 7:04 PM John Hubbard wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just ran into this and it's a real pain to figure out, because even
> > > with
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:46:29AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 7:04 PM John Hubbard wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just ran into this and it's a real pain to figure out, because even
> > with the very latest Fedora 33 on my test machine, which provides clang
> > version
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 7:04 PM John Hubbard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just ran into this and it's a real pain to figure out, because even
> with the very latest Fedora 33 on my test machine, which provides clang
> version 11.0.0:
Hi John,
Thanks for the report. The patch was picked up by AKPM and
Hi,
I just ran into this and it's a real pain to figure out, because even
with the very latest Fedora 33 on my test machine, which provides clang
version 11.0.0:
$ clang --version
clang version 11.0.0 (Fedora 11.0.0-2.fc33)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
...the bpftrace program still chokes
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:34:49AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Shouldn't "#ifndef" be before the whole version check? Otherwise,
> LGTM. Please CC me once there is a properly formed patch to try out.
(to my kernel org address).
/Jarkko
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 05:18:38PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:48:27AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:55 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:48:27AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:55 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:59:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > +#define CLANG_VERSION
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:48:27AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:55 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:59:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > +#define CLANG_VERSION (__clang_major__ * 1 \
> > > + +
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:55 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:59:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > +#define CLANG_VERSION (__clang_major__ * 1 \
> > + + __clang_minor__ * 100\
> > + + __clang_patchlevel__)
> > +
> > +#if
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:38:14PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 06:55:21AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:59:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > > Clang for
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 06:55:21AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:59:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
> >
> > We plan to remove
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:59:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
>
> We plan to remove workarounds for older versions now, which will break
> in subtle and not so subtle
During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
We plan to remove workarounds for older versions now, which will break
in subtle and not so subtle ways.
Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor
13 matches
Mail list logo
